Last updated on December 30th, 2018 at 08:39 am
Over the past few weeks I have been trying to figure out how to track funnels where the order of the steps is relevant and the conversion can happen over more than one visit.
During my research I came across a great post by Arthur Klepchukov. In his post, Arthur Klepchukov compares three tools: Mixpanel Analytics, Google Analytics and KISSmetrics. For me, the only part missing was the support of real funnel tracking.
If you have not yet read my past posts, a real funnel, in my opinion, is a set of steps that are in a specific order, and the user must go through all of them, in the correct order, before completing a goal. I often call them “chronological funnels” and in actual fact I think that ALL funnels should be chronological funnels. Otherwise they’re not really funnels.
In this post I will try to fill in the missing part and add my comments to the above mentioned comparison.
Mixpanel supports real/chronological funnels. Arthur’s post was published before Mixpanel 2.0 was launched with its improved (and beautiful) funnel report, but version 1.0, Mixpanel does also support chronological funnels. You can try it yourself or read about it in their FAQ page.
Anyway, I created a funnel with 3 steps: A, B and C and ran a quick test on three users:
The first user went from A to B in one visit, and then on to C in a different visit.
The second user went from A to C to B in one visit.
The third user went from A to B to C in one visit.
With Mixpanel I get the following results:
Mixpanel presented the correct results and the setup phase was pretty simple – I managed to implement it on my site in next to no time. Another advantage is the fact that you can use it for free, providing you have up to 100,000 events per month, which is pretty generous.
With KISSmetrics I received the following results, for the same 3 users:
Clearly, KISSmetrics interprets funnels differently. As I mentioned in one of my previous posts, I received the following answer from their Customer Support: When you set up the following funnel: “A -> B -> C”, with KISSmetrics, this means “Of all the people who performed A within the date range, how many also performed B and C – in any order”.
I have a feeling that their huge advantage of allowing their users to create funnels on the fly is actually the reason why they cannot provide a real funnel analytic solution.
I am not quite sure why they used this flow/funnel chart to present the data. It’s a bit confusing. From the screenshot above, I am pretty sure that 10 out 10 people will tell you that you had a 100% conversion rate from step B to C, while this is clearly not the case.
I did, however, manage to get what I was looking for using the same trick that I used with Google Analytics. To use this trick you have to define your funnels in advanced, but I think that is a reasonable enough requirement. If you want to be able to define funnels on the fly, you will have to define all possible combinations. For example, if you have steps/pages A, B and C, you will have to define 15 possible funnels in the tracking code: A, B, C, AB, ABC, AC, ACB, BA, BAC, BC, BCA, CA, CAB, CB and CBA. This is, of course, not realistic if you have a few dozen pages on your site.
I wish KISSmetrics would add a feature for tracking real funnels. I think they have a great product, with an amazing UI, but without this option there are many cases it will not be able to track your funnels correctly.
Google Analytics (and PadiTrack)
I have already written about my experiences with Google Analytics and chronological funnels. As long as users go through the whole funnel in one visit, Google Analytics provides a great solution. If however there is a possibility for your users to go through the funnel in more than one visit, then without my workaround or a similar solution you will not be able to use Google Analytics for tracking your funnels accurately.
While I was researching this issue, I tested PadiTrack, a free conversion funnel tracking tool that allows you to create funnels on the fly. This tool imports its data from Google Analytics so I guess the same problem occurs here as well. The screen shot below is the result for the exact same test that I performed with KISSmetrics and mixpanel analytics:
I am not sure how to explain the number in step C. The number in orange (1) indicates the amount people who visited both this step and the previous one, and the number in green (2) shows the amount of people who entered the funnel through this step.
It is currently very hard to find a web analytic tool that provides an accurate chronological funnel data on the fly (if you know of any, please let me know). If the order of the steps is not that important, you can go with Google Analytics or KISSmetrics. But if you can live without the option of creating funnels on the fly, you should definitely go with Mixpanel Analytics, or implement a similar solution to your current analytics system.